<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Insane Cash For Clunkers Program</title>
	<atom:link href="/2009/07/27/the-insane-cash-for-clunkers-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.femmenoir.net/2009/07/27/the-insane-cash-for-clunkers-program/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:13:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A.D. Odom</title>
		<link>http://www.femmenoir.net/2009/07/27/the-insane-cash-for-clunkers-program/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>A.D. Odom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stateandlake.net/ado/?p=4489#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Now, if you paid the $8,000 in cash on the remaining balance you received benefit of the bargain and is the best way to purchase a car under this program.  However, if we return to the credit market -- which is how we got into the mess we&#039;re in today -- the next best thing is to finance that $8,000 at 0% to 5% for 12 to 24 months.  Your balance could be around $13,000 and you still have a pretty nice bargain.  If your credit is not good you may end up paying more than 5% finance, or worse, 8%, 9% or 10%, and your bottom line could exceed $16,000, $18,000, $23,000 or more if you extend the payments out to 60 months.  No benefit, no bargain particularly if your job is shaky at best.

For me the program does not work.  To enter into a credit agreement for two or three years is not worth it under these economic conditions.  I am not willing to pay full coverage on insurance or an exorbitant amount of money at the DMV for license renewal every year for the next few years on a new car.  It&#039;s not worth it to me.  I&#039;ll keep my paid-for clunker and pay less in insurance and license fees.   When and if I trade it in I will purchase a pre-owned car -- one that was probably repossessed -- with all of the bells and whistles of the old one for a lot less money some time next year.

Having read a few comments on message boards around the net and particularly on CNN&#039;s iReports, folks are already having misgivings.  Some purchased cars not realizing their credit was not up to par and in the heat of the moment signed for long repayment plans at high interest rates for cars they weren&#039;t really passionate about.  When the smell of the carcinogens finally subsides, the reality is they are now paying more per month than they were when they were hanging in there with the old clunker and that&#039;s an uneasy feeling if your job is shaky and you&#039;re struggling to make ends meet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, if you paid the $8,000 in cash on the remaining balance you received benefit of the bargain and is the best way to purchase a car under this program.  However, if we return to the credit market &#8212; which is how we got into the mess we&#8217;re in today &#8212; the next best thing is to finance that $8,000 at 0% to 5% for 12 to 24 months.  Your balance could be around $13,000 and you still have a pretty nice bargain.  If your credit is not good you may end up paying more than 5% finance, or worse, 8%, 9% or 10%, and your bottom line could exceed $16,000, $18,000, $23,000 or more if you extend the payments out to 60 months.  No benefit, no bargain particularly if your job is shaky at best.</p>
<p>For me the program does not work.  To enter into a credit agreement for two or three years is not worth it under these economic conditions.  I am not willing to pay full coverage on insurance or an exorbitant amount of money at the DMV for license renewal every year for the next few years on a new car.  It&#8217;s not worth it to me.  I&#8217;ll keep my paid-for clunker and pay less in insurance and license fees.   When and if I trade it in I will purchase a pre-owned car &#8212; one that was probably repossessed &#8212; with all of the bells and whistles of the old one for a lot less money some time next year.</p>
<p>Having read a few comments on message boards around the net and particularly on CNN&#8217;s iReports, folks are already having misgivings.  Some purchased cars not realizing their credit was not up to par and in the heat of the moment signed for long repayment plans at high interest rates for cars they weren&#8217;t really passionate about.  When the smell of the carcinogens finally subsides, the reality is they are now paying more per month than they were when they were hanging in there with the old clunker and that&#8217;s an uneasy feeling if your job is shaky and you&#8217;re struggling to make ends meet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.femmenoir.net/2009/07/27/the-insane-cash-for-clunkers-program/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stateandlake.net/ado/?p=4489#comment-92</guid>
		<description>If you qualify for $4,500 then you&#039;re actually getting $9,000 because Chrysler, Jeep, and Dodge are all doing double the cash back.  I researched it and found that I can get a brand new Jeep Grand Cherokee for $8,000.  It&#039;s $18,000 automatic transmission with 4WD with the 3.5L engine size I&#039;m looking for.  So I get $4,500 for my clunker, another $4,500 since I&#039;m buying  Jeep (double the cash) and then the added value of my SUV, $1,000.  All in all I&#039;m getting $10,000 towards a NEW car.  I&#039;m paying $8,000 - that&#039;s the price of a pre-owned fuel efficient car - for a NEW Jeep Grand Cherokee.  I feel you were too quick to criticize and only looked at flaws rather than benefits.  $10,000 towards a new car sounds like a great idea to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you qualify for $4,500 then you&#8217;re actually getting $9,000 because Chrysler, Jeep, and Dodge are all doing double the cash back.  I researched it and found that I can get a brand new Jeep Grand Cherokee for $8,000.  It&#8217;s $18,000 automatic transmission with 4WD with the 3.5L engine size I&#8217;m looking for.  So I get $4,500 for my clunker, another $4,500 since I&#8217;m buying  Jeep (double the cash) and then the added value of my SUV, $1,000.  All in all I&#8217;m getting $10,000 towards a NEW car.  I&#8217;m paying $8,000 &#8211; that&#8217;s the price of a pre-owned fuel efficient car &#8211; for a NEW Jeep Grand Cherokee.  I feel you were too quick to criticize and only looked at flaws rather than benefits.  $10,000 towards a new car sounds like a great idea to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdice</title>
		<link>http://www.femmenoir.net/2009/07/27/the-insane-cash-for-clunkers-program/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>cdice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stateandlake.net/ado/?p=4489#comment-90</guid>
		<description>And not only will people still be out of work - after the new one is repo&#039;ed they won&#039;t have a vehicle to look for a new job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And not only will people still be out of work &#8211; after the new one is repo&#8217;ed they won&#8217;t have a vehicle to look for a new job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
